ResJudicataClaim is an Original, Authentic, Researched, and Personally FACT Verified ~ Lawful Production of the Cestui Que Vie, The Living, known by Lane - the Sole, Singular, ONLY Beneficiary of, to and FOR: 'legal' artificial 'person', ens legis LANE LEE BOWERSİ a UNITED STATES Cestui Que Contract TRUST, a government created entity for purposes of commerce, allowing interaction with the Realm of DEAD Entities (CORPORATIONS), Identified by and as Numbered Account 4**-**-***1 of the Social Security Administration, as well as TRUST Protector of the LANE LEE BOWERSİ CESTUI QUE TRUST Recorded on the Books of Record for Nashville, Davidson County Tennessee Records, August 12, 2009, Instrument Number 200908120076009. FACTS of Law Destroy "legal" Presumptions Under 'Color of Law'
Juramentum est indivisibile, et non est admittendum in parte verum et in parte falsam.
An oath is indivisible, it cannot be in part true and in part false.

There is a Purpose For Designating Witnesses...

The following is My Official Statement to ALL Who Were Selected.

       

        If there is a dispute concerning ANY Lawfully executed Administrative Procedure, multiple Oath Giving Public Officials have Witnessed the entire Administrative Process from beginning date to full completion date.
        This insures for example one or more of the Offenders choose to litigate when JUDGMENT is FINAL Due to their NON-Response to any of the three documented NOTICES they received.

        It is by their own choice They DID NOT Answer or Respond when they 'as TRUSTEEs' are by law required to do so.
        Nor does it matter that the Offender, at their own discretion sought uneducated or inadequate counsel concerning My Administrative Process Documentation of their Lawlessness.
        The resulting JUDGMENT of any Administrative Process is entirely up to the recipient, they were given more than plenty of time to answer and respond before it is rendered irreversible.

        Again, due to ignorance as educated, uneducated People they are found in want of rescue when the opportunity for self-preservation has past and they are faced with the consequences of their own neglegence by either action, or lack thereof.

        As stated, more than the allotted time is given on each stage of any Administrative Process therefore, no one has reason to complain after the FACT but to themself for not acting when the opportunity was given.

MAXIMs and the Principals of Law Govern An Administrative Procedure Entirely ~ He who does not deny, admits. ~ An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. ~ An unrebutted affidavit becomes judgment in commerce. ~ Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit. ~ He who consents cannot receive an injury. ~ A matter must be expressed to be resolved. ~ A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by counter affidavit point by point, resolution by a Lawful jury of our Peers, or payment of the claim. Click Here to View.
"The ability to place a lien upon a man's property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times."
United States Supreme Court, 1969, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349



        The Public Official Witnesses may be subpoenaed to provide First-Hand testimony concerning the timeliness and veracity of an Administrative Procedure they were Witness to if an unforeseen event should occur, such as one of the Offenders litigating to skirt their Responsibility to a FINAL JUDGMENT.


C.C. Witnesses to:
NOTICE   of COUNTERCLAIM ~ Citation #E020937 ~ An Averment of Lawful Principle

Merrick B. Garland, UNITED STATES Attorney General,
Ken Paxton, STATE OF TEXAS Attorney General,

Dana W. Cooley, STATE OF TEXAS 132nd DISTRICT COURT Judge


C.C. Witnesses to:
NOTICE of Counter-Resolve to E020937 Summons and;
2nd Municipal Court NOTICE of Invoice


Merrick B. Garland, UNITED STATES Attorney General,
Jodey Cook Arrington, STATE OF TEXAS Representative,
Jane Nelson, STATE OF TEXAS Secretary of State

C.C. Witnesses to:
2nd FOIA Request for BOND/Insurance Information

Merrick B. Garland, UNITED STATES Attorney General,

Open Records Division
OFFICE OF THE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL

Dana W. Cooley STATE OF TEXAS 132nd DISTRICT COURT Judge


C.C. Witnesses to:
DEMAND NOTICE for BOND/Insurance Information

Merrick B. Garland, UNITED STATES Attorney General,
Ken Paxton, STATE OF TEXAS Attorney General,

Dana W. Cooley, STATE OF TEXAS 132nd DISTRICT COURT Judge

C.C. Witnesses to:
Dana W. Cooley desiring Removal from her TRUSTEE / Fiduciary Duty as a Designated Witness.

Merrick B. Garland, UNITED STATES Attorney General,

Judge Ben Woodward, STATE OF TEXAS 7th Administrative Judicial Region,

Jane Nelson, STATE OF TEXAS Secretary of State

Upon Completion of Administrative Process ~ ALL Records will be Delivered to: Assistant Attorney General, Kristen M. Clarke C/O The United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division


BOND DEMAND NOTICE Results and NON-Response will be Reported to: Texas Insurance Commissioner, Cassie Brown, Texas Department of Insurance, PO Box 12030, MC GC-ORO, Austin, TX 78711-2030

       It should be an Honor to be a Designated Witness to an Administrative Procedure.

        It goes without saying that to uphold the "Law of the Land" is a Position of Dier Responsibility, a Responsibility Rife with Unlearned Opinions that Matter NOT.
        Happening Now Across America, every CORPORATE Oath Giving Administrator, Fiduciary, or Public Trust TRUSTEE should pay close attention.
        It's NOT a Game to negatively impact and dictate conditions on People's Live’s with impunity with nonexistent Lawful oversight.
        The question remaining is, are court administered adjudications, conclusions and decisions truly in harmony with the "Law of the Land", if NOT they are Void of Lawful Force and NOT Law at all.
        And if NOT Law at all, do you have the tenacity and guts to make changes that are TRULY Beneficial for your constituents who supported you to hold that OFFICE of TRUST?

        I'm talking about all the American People of the Public Trust you gave Voluntary Oath to uphold, NOT just to Secure the Guaranteed Rights of those who are your buddy's, hell your buddys may NOT have supported you at all, yet you'll stand up for them.
        Or, is there other considerations, because your fealty is to something entirely different than what the Public Trust and the American People of it are ever made aware of?
        The question is your integrity to the OFFICE of TRUST you hold, if your Fiduciary Duty isn't specifically to the American People you gave Your Voluntary Oath to Serve and Protect against enemy's foreign and domestic, then what are you doing?

NO Qualified Immunity for LEO’s or PERG's ‘Policy Enforcer Revenue Generators’ nor for the CORPORATIONS Living Administrators Who Abuse Their Fellow Americans in Opposition to The Law of the Land, Their Fiduciary Duty to the Public OFFICE they occupy, ALL Lawlessly Against Their Individual Voluntary Oath of Public TRUSTEE-ship to Serve and Protect the People. As an Employee of a mere CORPORATION, you pretend to be a Public Servant when in reality you are PAID as an employee of a FOR-PROFIT BUSINESS Entity ONLY Masquerading as a Public Service Provider when in FACT these Business Entity's ONLY Purpose is to take as much as possible from the People who provide these imposters with a comfortable living. There is NO Qualified Immunity for Corporate Imposters. Click Here to View.

Nemo me impune lacessit ’No One Provokes Me With Impunity’ Res Judicata "pro veritate accipitur" A thing adjudged must be taken for truth. "Scire debes cum quo contrahis" You Ought To Know With Whom You Deal. Original Security Instruments are the Principals Property Retained in Trust By Agent,: Bowers, Lane Lee, Beneficiary, Until Performance in FULL, Settlement, Release or Collateralized. ResJudicataClaim.comİ 2024 ~ By: Bowers, Lane Lee, Beneficiary, Iowan by Birth, Texan by Choice, American in Perpetuity ALL Rights Explicitly Reserved, Waiving NONE With Prejudice!
'There is NO Immunity or Exemption for Deliberate Lawlessness'